Browse our services
Explore how Brookes Bell can help you
Find an expert
Meet our team, find and expert and connect
Contact us
Get in touch, we're here to help

The UK’s sale of five Type 26 frigates to Norway has secured a record £10–£13 billion export boost for British shipbuilding, but defence analysts warn that transferring hulls mid‑production could shrink the Royal Navy’s near‑term frigate strength.
The Norwegian purchase of at least five Type 26 anti‑submarine frigates is the largest‑by‑value export order for UK warship builders and promises a substantial jobs and supply‑chain dividend for yards on the Clyde and across Britain.
The Type 26, built by BAE Systems, is designed primarily for anti‑submarine warfare (ASW). Its quiet propulsion and an advanced Thales towed‑array sonar make it a highly effective hunter of subsurface threats, though the design carries more limited dedicated anti‑air and area‑air‑defence capability compared with larger multirole combatants.
Announced in late August, the deal expands the combined series to 13 hulls, boosting allied North Atlantic ASW capacity. However, it has prompted debate over whether some Royal Navy‑designated hulls might be reallocated to Norway during the production run to realise short‑term savings for the Ministry of Defence.
The Royal Navy’s current confirmed buy stands at eight Type 26s, a smaller ambition than originally planned after the cancellation of general‑purpose variants in favour of lower‑cost Type 31 frigates.
The MOD said the deal would safeguard thousands of British jobs into the 2030s and sustain an extensive domestic supplier base. RUSI and other analysts noted the export will promote solidarity between NATO partners, aiding shared communication and logistics for North Atlantic and Arctic patrols.
Yet independent commentators have warned that the deal could inadvertently create a capability shortfall for the Royal Navy if hulls earmarked for Britain are transferred to Norway mid‑build.
Navy Lookout has reported suggestions that some mid‑production ships could be sold to Norway as a means to defer UK capital expenditure, and risks deepening an existing “frigate gap” as ageing Type 23 frigates reach the end of their service lives.
BAE Systems has said the 13‑ship programme will be treated as a single, continuous run and that sequencing with Norwegian ships will be agreed between governments to meet both navies’ operational requirements.
The MOD faces cost and affordability challenges from inflation, rising personnel costs and constrained departmental budgets, and commentators say transferring hulls could be an attractive short‑term fiscal expedient.
However, critics argue any reduction in RN Type 26 numbers risks leaving the service with fewer modern ASW frigates to replace an ageing Type 23 fleet, potentially undermining Britain’s contribution to collective NATO submarine‑hunting capability.
For now, the industrial and diplomatic wins are clear. The Type 26 export deal cements the UK’s role as a supplier of advanced ASW ships and secures employment for thousands of workers.
The outstanding political question is whether ministers will prioritise immediate fiscal relief over preserving the Royal Navy’s full long‑term Type 26 order, a decision that will shape the service’s frigate fleet and the UK’s maritime posture for years to come.
The highly-complex field of naval architecture requires practitioners to have an acute understanding of multiple branches of engineering to create beautiful, yet seaworthy vessels and structures.
Luckily, this is a field Brookes Bell excels in. If you need naval architecture support, Brookes Bell’s depth of experience and culture of innovations make us the first choice.
For more maritime industry insights, news and information, read the Brookes Bell News and Knowledge Hub…
A Brief History of the Suez Canal | The World's Largest Container Ships | Iraq’s Al Faw Port and “Dry Canal” to Rewrite the Global Trade Map